<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Sustainable Packaging on PaperPackLog</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/categories/sustainable-packaging/</link><description>Recent content in Sustainable Packaging on PaperPackLog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 07:17:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/en/categories/sustainable-packaging/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Packaging recyclability grade assessment: what the expansion of top-grade packaging means for paper packaging design</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/packaging-recyclability-grade-design-checkpoints-2026/</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 07:17:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/packaging-recyclability-grade-design-checkpoints-2026/</guid><description>Paper packaging is not automatically recyclable in practice. This article explains how Korea’s recyclability grade assessment should influence design decisions around coatings, labels, adhesives, and mixed materials.</description></item><item><title>WPO on Wishcycling: Why Recycling Expectations Are Changing Packaging Design</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/wpo-wishcycling-paper-packaging-design-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:09 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/wpo-wishcycling-paper-packaging-design-2026/</guid><description>A practical look at WPO&amp;rsquo;s Interpack 2026 wishcycling signal, explaining why recyclable claims must match actual collection, sorting, and reprocessing systems, and how B2B paper packaging teams can turn that into design checkpoints.</description></item></channel></rss>