<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Creases on PaperPackLog</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/creases/</link><description>Recent content in Creases on PaperPackLog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:50:53 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/creases/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Brohl Wellpappe's waterscoring case: where fold claims meet measurement</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/brohl-waterscoring-fold-evidence-2026/</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2026 17:50:53 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/brohl-waterscoring-fold-evidence-2026/</guid><description>Examine the boundaries of waterscoring claims and the flute-, format- and line-specific checks needed before adoption.</description></item></channel></rss>