<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Damyang on PaperPackLog</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/damyang/</link><description>Recent content in Damyang on PaperPackLog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:52:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/damyang/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Damyang pumping-station removal call is not a paper-mill water cutoff</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/damyang-yongsan-pump-station-demolition-debate-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:52:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/damyang-yongsan-pump-station-demolition-debate-2026/</guid><description>The October 14 parliamentary argument and the rural infrastructure operator&amp;#39;s response are distinct from an official removal or water-cutoff decision.</description></item></channel></rss>