<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Doughnut Packaging on PaperPackLog</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/doughnut-packaging/</link><description>Recent content in Doughnut Packaging on PaperPackLog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 08:20:55 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/en/tags/doughnut-packaging/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mr Whippy's linerless doughnut-tray labels: What the Ravenwood case does—and does not—show</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/mr-whippy-ravenwood-linerless-doughnut-tray-2026/</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 08:20:55 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/en/posts/mr-whippy-ravenwood-linerless-doughnut-tray-2026/</guid><description>Ravenwood describes a Nobac 5000 Twin Head applicator applying D-Wrap labels to Mr Whippy&amp;rsquo;s two-, four- and six-doughnut trays. The announced production target is not measured throughput; this case sets out the missing pack and line evidence.</description></item></channel></rss>