<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>리베이션 on 페이퍼팩로그</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/tags/%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%A0%EC%9D%B4%EC%85%98/</link><description>Recent content in 리베이션 on 페이퍼팩로그</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>ko</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:00:00 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/ko/tags/%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%A0%EC%9D%B4%EC%85%98/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>리베이션의 종이 성형 포장 개발기간 ‘절반’ 주장, 확인해야 할 기준은</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/posts/revation-molded-paper-development-lead-time-claim-2026/</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 07:00:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/posts/revation-molded-paper-development-lead-time-claim-2026/</guid><description>종이 성형 패키징의 개발기간 단축 주장을 읽을 때 비교 대상·시험 조건·양산 전환 기준을 확인하는 방법.</description></item></channel></rss>