<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>WPO on 페이퍼팩로그</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/tags/wpo/</link><description>Recent content in WPO on 페이퍼팩로그</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>ko</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:09 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paperpacklog.com/ko/tags/wpo/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>WPO가 말한 wishcycling: 잘못된 재활용 기대가 포장 설계를 바꾼다</title><link>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/posts/wpo-wishcycling-paper-packaging-design-2026/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:09 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://paperpacklog.com/ko/posts/wpo-wishcycling-paper-packaging-design-2026/</guid><description>WPO가 Interpack 2026 맥락에서 지적한 wishcycling 문제를 바탕으로, 재활용 가능 표시가 실제 수거·선별·재처리 조건과 맞아야 하는 이유와 B2B 종이포장 설계 체크포인트를 정리한다.</description></item></channel></rss>